The Joker assaults 'Kid' Congressman

The POLITICO piece noting broad Twitter reaction to Joe "Chuckles" Biden's jocularity at the VP debate Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012: Vice President Joe Biden and Rep. Paul Ryan were the two candidates on stage at Thursday’s vice presidential debate, but a third character emerged: Joe Biden’s laugh, which didn’t escape the notice of tweeting politicos. (And led, of course, to at least three satirical Twitter accounts: Laughing Joe Biden, Biden Smirk, and yet another Laughing Joe Biden.)

Weekly Standard’s Mark Hemingway: “Joe Biden’s laughing through talking about Iran sanctions?”

Washington Examiner’s Philip Klein: “Biden’s strategy seems to be to laugh at Ryan constantly. Will it work to infantalize Ryan, or backfire like Gore sighing?”

ABC’s Rick Klein: “Biden on verge of breaking down in laughter when Ryan talks.”

Former Eric Cantor staffer Brad Dayspring: “Joe Biden needs to realize this isn’t a Senate Foreign Relations Hearing. His laughter and condescending attitude is a disaster.”

Radio host Neal Boortz: “Looking like Biden’s gameplan is to laugh his way through this.”

Townhall.com’s Guy Benson: “Will Biden laugh his ass off at the terrible economy, too?”

Movie critic Roger Ebert: “Joe! Stop smiling and laughing!”

Washington Times’ Emily Miller: “Biden laughing when he disagrees with Ryan is so annoying. Like a child in time out.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82313.html#ixzz295qQXO4V

Funny, Twitter generally burst with reactions that Biden's grinning, laughing and general condescending attitude at the table was distracting at best, certainly awkward, and even disturbing.

Yet, Politico's own Roger Simon was all jolly over the weird display of hyena-like aggression (verging on rabid-like, too): "Biden smirked, sneered, and openly laughed at many of Ryan’s responses. It could have looked rude, but Biden made it look tough.

"After all, Biden was the 69-year-old defender and Ryan was the 42-year-old challenger. But by the end of the evening, Joltin’ Joe had done real damage to his opponent." (Read Simon's adoring piece: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82323.html#ixzz295ssBwhL )

"FORWARD" THIS, Obama-Biden folks: I hear Biden's up for playing an aging Joker in the next Batman movie reboot. I wonder who should be Two-Face? The Riddler? Catwoman might be Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (not meant in a sexy way, I assure you). Hmm, I see a parody coming on... David Zucker, are you reading this?

-jR

Posted via email from Like, Totally Political Dude! - posterous

No fashion sense: Think Progress

Think Progress is a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund. The Center for American Progress Action Fund is a nonpartisan organization.

ThinkProgress was voted “Best Liberal Blog” in the 2006 Weblog Awards and chosen as an Official Honoree in the 2009 and 2012 Webby awards. It was also named best blog of 2008 by The Sidney Hillman Foundation, receiving an award for journalism excellence. In 2009, ThinkProgress was named a “Gold Award Winner” by the International Academy of Visual Arts.

Without your generous support, we cannot do the work that we do. Please consider donating

Editors

via thinkprogress.org

I noticed one thing on the "About" page for ThinkProgress that really impacted me. Sadly, it wasn't the impressive education credentials of much of the staff. A third of the staff have no concept of fashion. Also, they need a photographer who isn't blind to re-take some of the head shots. Have a look, seriously! If you don't agree, then tell me. I'd love to hear your views contrary to my claim.

I don't read ThinkProgress because, like the work of those doofuses at MoveOn.org, it's often one-quarter truths dressed up with the typical leftist bitterness against anyone who disagrees with their party line. Despite being what I have been led to believe was the "liberal" equivalent of Breitbart.com, along with Media Matters, this site typically offers what only the most off-the-rails "conservative" sites and newsletters can offer by comparison. (And no, Occupy activists and socialists living in mommy's attic, I am not talking about Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. Get back to your video games, cheese snacks and Huff-and-Puff Post comments, now, and leave reality to those who actually live in it.)

Is fashion the most important thing in the world? No. Is having a vague sense of self-awareness a hint that someone has a clue? Uh, yeah.

Heck, consider Glamour Shots, kids. Certainly cannot hurt to go too far the other way with the staff photos. Oh, and "nonpartisan" my seat warmer.

- jR

Posted via email from Like, Totally Political Dude! - posterous

No fashion sense: Think Progress

Think Progress is a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund. The Center for American Progress Action Fund is a nonpartisan organization.

ThinkProgress was voted “Best Liberal Blog” in the 2006 Weblog Awards and chosen as an Official Honoree in the 2009 and 2012 Webby awards. It was also named best blog of 2008 by The Sidney Hillman Foundation, receiving an award for journalism excellence. In 2009, ThinkProgress was named a “Gold Award Winner” by the International Academy of Visual Arts.

Without your generous support, we cannot do the work that we do. Please consider donating

Editors

via thinkprogress.org

I noticed one thing on the "About" page for ThinkProgress that really impacted me. Sadly, it wasn't the impressive education credentials of much of the staff. A third of the staff have no concept of fashion. Also, they need a photographer who isn't blind to re-take some of the head shots. Have a look, seriously! If you don't agree, then tell me. I'd love to hear your views contrary to my claim.

I don't read ThinkProgress because, like the work of those doofuses at MoveOn.org, it's often one-quarter truths dressed up with the typical leftist bitterness against anyone who disagrees with their party line. Despite being what I have been led to believe was the "liberal" equivalent of Breitbart.com, along with Media Matters, this site typically offers what only the most off-the-rails "conservative" sites and newsletters can offer by comparison. (And no, Occupy activists and socialists living in mommy's attic, I am not talking about Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. Get back to your video games, cheese snacks and Huff-and-Puff Post comments, now, and leave reality to those who actually live in it.)

Is fashion the most important thing in the world? No. Is having a vague sense of self-awareness a hint that someone has a clue? Uh, yeah.

Heck, consider Glamour Shots, kids. Certainly cannot hurt to go too far the other way with the staff photos. Oh, and "nonpartisan" my seat warmer.

- jR

Posted via email from Like, Totally Political Dude! - posterous

JFK's red line versus Obama's long rope

Israel's Prime Minister Ben Netanyahu:
In an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press, said it was important to communicate to Iran that there is a line that it cannot cross, and added that president John F. Kennedy set a similar red line in the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis that did not bring about war, as some had warned, but “actually pushed war back and probably purchased decades of peace with the Soviet Union.”
...
“This is a country that denies the Holocaust, promises to wipe out Israel, is engaged in terror throughout the world.
It’s like Timothy McVeigh walking into a shop in Oklahoma City and saying ‘I'd like to tend my garden. I would like to buy some fertilizer.’ ‘How much do you want?’ ‘Oh, I don’t know, 20,000 pounds.’ “Come on, we know that they’re working towards a weapon,” the prime minister said. “It’s not something that we surmise. We have absolute certainty about that.”
Netanyahu’s arguments, however, did not convince the administration.
via http://www.jpost.com
http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=285467

Netanyahu didn't convince this administration? There's a shock.

- jR







Andrew Cohen: Obama is right to ignore Netanyahu (Ottawa Citizen)

In the Jewish calendar, the interlude between Rosh Hashanah (the New Year) and Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement) is called the Days of Awe. During these 10 days, Jews reflect on themselves and their faith.

Like observant Jews everywhere, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will consider his conduct over the last year and seek forgiveness for his transgressions. He will have much to contemplate. Before the Days of Awe, Netanyahu had his Days of Audacity.

That’s audacity as in effrontery, not boldness. Netanyahu’s cardinal sin is interfering in the domestic politics of the United States, Israel’s friend, ally and benefactor, in a manner that is disingenuous, ungrateful and irresponsible.

Twice this month, Netanyahu has told the United States, publicly, to give Iran an ultimatum on its nuclear program. It should draw “a red line” that Iran cannot cross, he says. “Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don’t have a moral right to place a red line before Israel,” he told a news conference this month.

His point: that if America is not going to set limits on the Iranians and nuclear weapons, it has no right to tell Israel what to do.

As if those dense Americans didn’t recognize themselves as “the international community,” Netanyahu later went on American television to drive home the point.

Let’s get beyond the coded conversation. The prime minister is saying that President Barack Obama is unreliable. He does this as the president seeks re-election against a Republican who attacks him for being soft on Iran and hard on Israel, who claims Obama is “throwing Israel under the bus.”

It is very simple and very dangerous, Netanyahu’s game. In portraying Obama as weak, he plays to the Republican canard that on Israel — as in events in Libya and Egypt — the president has no backbone.

This is beyond audacity. It is chutzpah.

No wonder Obama is snubbing Netanyahu when he visits the United Nations this week. He resents Netanyahu’s megaphone diplomacy, which tries to drag the U.S. into a premature, preventive war, as well as his ingratitude for America’s magnanimous financial and military support of Israel.

For months, Netanyahu has been warning that Iran is getting the bomb, a refrain from him and other alarmists we have heard for 20 years. In his messianic view of himself and Jewish history, Israel has no choice but to strike first.

Netanyahu continues to argue this amid growing opposition in Israel, particularly among influential insiders, such as Meir Dagan, who ran Mossad. Read Dagan’s assessment of Iran in the New Yorker, and see the emptiness — and recklessness — of Netanyahu’s declarations on Iran.

It was madness to speak of hitting Iran in January, when Netanyahu began his new season of sabre-rattling, and it is madness now. Attacking Iran isn’t about weak-kneed morality. It is about hard-headed practicality.

And practically speaking, it just doesn’t add up.

No credible intelligence suggests that Israel has the ability to destroy Iran’s capacity to make a nuclear bomb. It can delay it, yes, for six to 24 months.

So there's a big shock. A dithering academic fluff-maker finds it important to defend the campaigner-in-chief, the radical-inspired, duck-and-cover, lead-from-behind Progressive borne of academia, President Barack Obama. As if he needs defending. Poor Obama, all he's got is the world's biggest bully pulpit from which be may mislead the world, nothing more. Well, there is that nagging left-leaning TV and print media that dotes on him, not to mention all the surrogates who sustain this largest head among figureheads.

Yet, a Canadian professor is coming to poor little Barry's defense against that overbearing master of mean, Bibi of tiny little Israel. That harbinger of threats to the world from Europe to Asia, that radical theocracy run by... oh wait. I'm talking about Iran. What the hell is this Canadian school marm's honey doing? Is he meshugenah?! He's defending Obama's rejection of personal talks with Bibi?

Yes, let's not rattle sabres at Iran, that might get them riled up. We can't have that. They're such a peaceful nation. Well, after Obama essentially ignored that people's uprising in Iran, which the totalitarian theocracy violently held down, that is. They've been peaceful since then, huh? Well, except for shipping arms to Syria. They've been. No, no I'm wrong, Iran isn't worth our attention.

Israel is, however. Just not according to one Jewish-Canadian academic fluff-maker. And the ladies on "The View." You're in good company there, Mr. Cohen!

Posted via email from Like, Totally Political Dude! - posterous